SWITCH.
MEMBER SIGN IN
    
Keep up-to-date on your favourite artists and movies, track gig and release dates, and join in the conversation.

SEARCH RESULTS FOR
JOIN NOW.

Keep up to date with your favourite artists and new music with SWITCH. It's easy - just follow these steps:

1JOIN up - it's simple and free
 
2FOLLOW artists and films
 
3TRACK events on your personalised calendar
 
review, Les Misérables, Les, Misérables, film, movie, latest movies, new movie, movie ratings, current movie reviews, latest films, recent movies, current movies, movie critics, new movie reviews, latest movie reviews, latest movies out, the latest movies, review film, latest cinema releases, Australian reviews, cinema, cinema reviews, Hugh Jackman - Jean Valjean, Russell Crowe - Javert, Amanda Seyfried - Cosette, Anne Hathaway - Fantine, Sacha Baron Cohen - Thénardier, Helena Bonham Carter - Thénardier's Wife, Eddie Redmayne - Marius, Samantha Barks - Eponine, Aaron Tveit - Enjolras, Geoffrey Rush, Tom Hooper film rating
REVIEW:

LES MISÉRABLES


A dream unfulfilled

star, ratingstar, rating
By Daniel Lammin, 23rd December 2012
review, Les Misérables, Les, Misérables, film, movie, latest movies, new movie, movie ratings, current movie reviews, latest films, recent movies, current movies, movie critics, new movie reviews, latest movie reviews, latest movies out, the latest movies, review film, latest cinema releases, Australian reviews, cinema, cinema reviews, Hugh Jackman - Jean Valjean, Russell Crowe - Javert, Amanda Seyfried - Cosette, Anne Hathaway - Fantine, Sacha Baron Cohen - Thénardier, Helena Bonham Carter - Thénardier's Wife, Eddie Redmayne - Marius, Samantha Barks - Eponine, Aaron Tveit - Enjolras, Geoffrey Rush, Tom Hooper
SWITCH logoReview. 

LES MISÉRABLES

|

A DREAM UNFULFILLED

film rating

RELEASE DATE: 26/12/2012
RUN TIME: 2HR 38MIN
CAST: HUGH JACKMAN - JEAN VALJEAN
RUSSELL CROWE - JAVERT
AMANDA SEYFRIED - COSETTE
ANNE HATHAWAY - FANTINE
SACHA BARON COHEN - THÉNARDIER
HELENA BONHAM CARTER - THÉNARDIER'S WIFE
EDDIE REDMAYNE - MARIUS
SAMANTHA BARKS - EPONINE
AARON TVEIT - ENJOLRAS
GEOFFREY RUSH
DIRECTOR: TOM HOOPER
WRITER: WILLIAM NICHOLSON
PRODUCERS: TIM BEVAN
ERIC FELLNER
DEBRA HAYWARD
CAMERON MACKINTOSH
WEBSITE: WWW.LESMISMOVIE.COM.AU
TWITTER: @LESMISERABLES
SWITCH logo
FAST FACTS.
Daniel Lammin
By Daniel Lammin, 23rd December 2012
stars, ratingstars, rating
It has been a long journey to the screen for the blockbuster 80s musical ‘Les Misérables’, but in the wake of his Oscar success with ‘The King’s Speech’ (2010), the task of finally rendering the musical cinematic fell to director Tom Hooper. With a tremendously exciting cast and a classic piece of source material (both Victor Hugo’s original novel and the acclaimed score by Alain Boublil, Claude-Michel Schönberg, and Herbert Kretzmer), anticipation has been high, and Universal have decided to throw the film in the ring during the highly competitive holiday season. There is a lot of faith and expectation going with this one.

After serving nearly twenty years for a minor theft, Jean Valjean (Hugh Jackman) skips on his parole and tries to carve a new life for himself in post-revolutionary France. When one of the workers at his factory, a young woman named Fantine (Anne Hathaway) is cast into the gutter, Valjean promises to find and care for her daughter Cosette. Hot on Valjean’s heels, however, is Inspector Javert (Russell Crowe), determined to find the fugitive and bring him to justice. Their chase across the decades leads them into the thick of a building revolution, and another decisive moment in France’s political history.

Even with its excellent source material and incredibly talented cast, ‘Les Misérables’ turns out to be an absolute mess. The technicalities of its execution are a sight to be seen in just how inept they are. The cinematography is wild and unfocused (literally, in many cases), shot with a never-ceasing hand-held, and at times, bad digital quality. With the camera in constant motion, there is a frenetic instability to the visual world of the film. There is also a weird tendency to never show two people on camera in a duet at the same time, so that, often, it feels like characters aren’t even in communication with each other. Even worse is the editing, some of the worst I’ve seen in a very long time. It seems as if the edit is set to cut every three seconds, with the film literally leaping from shot to shot without any time to sit and let us take the image in. There are so many possibilities for beautiful images, what with the landscape and the production design the film has to work with, but we are denied this at almost every turn. Yet perhaps the most upsetting element of the film is the sound mixing. ‘Les Misérables’ is significant in that all the performances by the cast were recorded live on set, lending them a sense of reality and passion you rarely see in a film musical. It’s a brilliant idea, and one that could have worked wonders, but for some reason, the actual score itself is mixed so low that, at times, you can barely hear it at all, and the actors appear to be singing to no accompaniment whatsoever. Because of this, their singing feels lacking and, at times, badly out of time. What is worse, when it comes to big hit songs, the orchestra suddenly becomes audible, meaning it is possible the lulls in the score was intentional. Regardless, it is so distracting that it almost destroys a number of performances, especially Russell Crowe, who sounds disconnected without the music to back him up.

SWITCH: LES MISÉRABLES - AUSTRALIAN PREMIERE RED CARPET

If it were one major element that didn’t work, it could be excused as the fault of the head of that department, but the filmmaking in ‘Les Misérables’ is so inept, it can only be the fault of Tom Hooper as a director. It is clear he has no idea how to make a film of this scale or style, and fumbles his way through the material. The performances may be fine, but the rhythm of the film is uneven and ill-managed, the rules of its handling of the music are warped and inconsistent, and for a musical with so much heart and resonance, the end result is cold and dull. These are the responsibilities of the director, and it is clear that Tom Hooper is not the man for the job. Pointing a camera at brilliant actors with excellent material and pressing record may have earned him an Oscar for ‘The King’s Speech’, but here, his ineptitude as a director cannot give this mighty piece the attention it requires.

Thankfully, the film is saved by its performances. Hugh Jackman is an inspired and passionate Valjean, and he hits every note with strong emotional resonance. If it were not for the appalling sound, Russell Crowe may have fared just as well, but he lacks the vocal punch of his cast, and the music isn’t there to help him. Also of note are Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter as the Thénardier’s, the innkeeper couple from whom Valjean saves the infant Cosette (played beautifully by Isabelle Allen). Their comedy is at times distracting and causes many emotional moments to land flat. Eddie Redmayne continues to show his talent as the young revolutionary Marius, who falls in love with the grown-up Cosette, played by Amanda Seyfried. However, even with her brief screen time, the film belongs to Anne Hathaway, who gives one of her finest performances to date as Fantine. Her performance of ‘I Dreamed A Dream’ is an absolute knockout, raw and ugly and deeply affecting. Thankfully, Hooper makes a rare inspired decision, and has her perform the song in a single take, entirely in close-up, maintaining the depth of her achievement. Expect award recognition for this performance, maybe even finally her overdue Oscar.

Even with its excellent source material and incredibly talented cast, ‘Les Misérables’ turns out to be an absolute mess.

There is so much that is left wanting with this film. Where there should have been something brilliant, instead there is something dull and lifeless, and ‘Les Misérables’ remains a shadow of the film it might have been in better hands. The final few minutes almost save the film from remaining passionless, but by then, the damage is done. The source material suggests we should have an emotional, sweeping epic on our hands, but in his search for gritty realism, Tom Hooper has made the film anything but. It was a great idea, and could have worked, but in the end, what we have is something that looks more akin to a bad BBC period drama. This is a gravely missed opportunity.

COMMENTS
TO LEAVE A COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE, PLEASE SIGN IN AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE OR CLICK HERE TO JOIN.

Daniel on 27 December 2012 at 7:22 PM
That's a beautiful quote, and does capture something the film doesn't, at least in such a meaningful way. I've since listened to the musical by itself, and it is a pretty terrific piece of material. All the ingredients are there to make that very point, and for it to be rousing and affecting. For me, now thinking back on the film, it just makes it feel more of a missed opportunity. That said, people have loved it, genuinely. I'd be interested to sit down with someone who did and hear what they thought of it.
zenticott on 27 December 2012 at 1:25 PM
Saw the anticipated epic last night and despite shedding the odd tear hear and there, I have to agree with the opinion that for an epic of this magnitude and a story that has profoundly touched hearts for two centuries: the musical/movie is a technical flop. In the preface to Victor Hugo's novel, Upton Sinclaire writes: “So long as there shall exist, by reason of law and custom, a social condemnation, which, in the face of civilization, artificially creates hells on earth, and complicates a destiny that is divine, with human fatality; so long as the three problems of the age—the degradation of man by poverty, the ruin of women by starvation, and the dwarfing of childhood by physical and spiritual night—are not solved; so long as, in certain regions, social asphyxia shall be possible; in other words, and from a yet more extended point of view, so long as ignorance and misery remain on earth, books like this cannot be useless.” For me, the power and meaning of this paragraph alone outweighs the entire three hour movie; making it seem like another Hollywood blockbuster unable to truly reinvent the passion of the French Revolution or to connect to the suffering of poverty.
© 2011 - 2017 midnightproductions | All rights reserved
© 2011 - 2017 midnightproductions
All rights reserved

Disclaimer | Contact Us