SWITCH.
MEMBER SIGN IN
    
Keep up-to-date on your favourite artists and movies, track gig and release dates, and join in the conversation.

SEARCH RESULTS FOR
JOIN NOW.

Keep up to date with your favourite artists and new music with SWITCH. It's easy - just follow these steps:

1JOIN up - it's simple and free
 
2FOLLOW artists and films
 
3TRACK events on your personalised calendar
 
review, Anna Karenina, Anna, Karenina, film, movie, latest movies, new movie, movie ratings, current movie reviews, latest films, recent movies, current movies, movie critics, new movie reviews, latest movie reviews, latest movies out, the latest movies, review film, latest cinema releases, Australian reviews, cinema, cinema reviews, Keira Knightley - Anna Karenina, Jude Law - Alexei Karenin, Aaron Johnson - Count Vronsky, Olivia Williams - Countess Vronsky, Emily Watson - Countess Lydia, Benedict Cumberbatch, Joe Wright film rating
REVIEW:

ANNA KARENINA


A Russian classic reinvented

star, ratingstar, ratingstar, ratingstar, rating
By Daniel Lammin, 14th February 2013
review, Anna Karenina, Anna, Karenina, film, movie, latest movies, new movie, movie ratings, current movie reviews, latest films, recent movies, current movies, movie critics, new movie reviews, latest movie reviews, latest movies out, the latest movies, review film, latest cinema releases, Australian reviews, cinema, cinema reviews, Keira Knightley - Anna Karenina, Jude Law - Alexei Karenin, Aaron Johnson - Count Vronsky, Olivia Williams - Countess Vronsky, Emily Watson - Countess Lydia, Benedict Cumberbatch, Joe Wright
SWITCH logoReview. 

ANNA KARENINA

|

A RUSSIAN CLASSIC REINVENTED

film rating

RELEASE DATE: 14/02/2013
RUN TIME: 2HR 9MIN
CAST: KEIRA KNIGHTLEY - ANNA KARENINA
JUDE LAW - ALEXEI KARENIN
AARON JOHNSON - COUNT VRONSKY
OLIVIA WILLIAMS - COUNTESS VRONSKY
EMILY WATSON - COUNTESS LYDIA
BENEDICT CUMBERBATCH
DIRECTOR: JOE WRIGHT
WRITER: TOM STOPPARD
PRODUCER: TIM BEVAN
SCORE: DARIO MARIONELLI
WEBSITE: WWW.ANNAKARENINAMOVIE.COM.AU
SWITCH logo
FAST FACTS.
Daniel Lammin
By Daniel Lammin, 14th February 2013
stars, ratingstars, ratingstars, ratingstars, rating
Whenever a classic novel is adapted to the screen, it brings with it tremendous expectation and a lot of history. So it takes a lot of guts to tackle an adaptation of what is generally regarded as the greatest novel ever written - one that has been imitated, discussed and beloved for over a hundred years. British director Joe Wright isn’t unfamiliar with this kind of pressure, debuting with his magnificent ‘Pride and Prejudice’ (2005), and following that with his masterpiece ‘Atonement’ (2007). Both films demonstrated a mature and dynamic handling of difficult material and an inventive and beautiful visual style, and were excellent preparation for this, his greatest challenge yet. Returning to the world of adaptation, Wright tackles head-on the behemoth of Leo Tolstoy’s ‘Anna Karenina’, an 800-page foundation stone of Russian and Western literature. The biggest surprise, though, is just how Joe Wright chooses to solve it.

Tolstoy’s great work places us at the height of Russian aristocracy at the end of the 1800s, before revolution rips it apart, and follows two protagonists, each pursuing their own ideas of love. One is Levin (Domhnall Gleeson), a young landowner of high morals and strong beliefs, who has fallen for Kitty (Alicia Vikander), a beautiful and impressionable young woman of royalty. The other is Anna Karenina (Keira Knightley), the wife of beloved diplomat Alexei Karenin (Jude Law). Stuck in a respectable marriage with a caring but distant man, she begins an illicit affair with a handsome young officer, Count Vronsky (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), which eventually threatens to dismantle not just her marriage, but her place within this world of manners and rules.

From the moment it begins, Wright’s film defies any expectations you might have about his approach to this adaptation. In a stroke of absolute brilliance, he choses to place the action that occurs in the high society of Moscow and St Petersburg, within an old Russian theatre, where bedrooms, restaurants, ice rinks, train stations are all sets flown in or erected within the theatrical space. Extras change costumes before our eyes, landscapes and crowds are painted on beautiful impressionist backdrops, even the performances brim with choreographed theatricality where every moving body in space is perfectly in sync with all those around them. It’s a striking visual language, brimming with possibility and electricity, as well as a strong comment on the society our characters exist in. Imperial Russian society is nothing but a grand performance, where every soul must play their part, and it is when someone moves against the tide of that performance that the production begins to come undone. It also creates a bubble, a defined universe for these rules and customs to exist in, and when a character leaves this bubble, like Levin returning to his country home, the doors of the theatre burst open onto the untamed Russian landscape, a door to escape through that’s always there, always a possibility, but a dangerous path to take nonetheless.

ANNA KARENINA - TRAILER

Choosing such a strong visual language also makes adapting the novel much easier for screenwriter and acclaimed playwright Tom Stoppard, filling in the details on Russian societies and customs and allowing more room for character development within its surprisingly short 130 minute running time. The dialogue crackles with such indelible wit and intelligence, the playful cynicism of Tolstoy with a bit of a Chekhovian snap. It’s as if the screenplay had fallen through a gap in time from the late 1800s, ready for Wright to shoot. The production design is a glorious, startling vision of Imperial Russia through the lens of 19th century theatre, Wright’s concept allowing production designer Sarah Greenwood to be more inventive and playful than a traditional costume drama might have allowed. Dario Marianelli’s score is also a treat, a wonderful homage to the romanticism of the music of Tchaikovsky as well as the traditional folk sounds of Russia itself.

Wright has always had his pick of talented actors, and ‘Anna Karenina’ is no exception. Once again, he finds something special in Knightley, who creates a real danger in Anna, both in her flirtations and her growing mental instability. This acts as a perfect counterpoint to the steely, quiet resolve of Jude Law, who finds a way to make Karenin frightening, sympathetic and distant all at once. Taylor-Johnson strides across the scene with intoxicating arrogance and vivacity, making Vronsky everything Karenin isn’t. His chemistry with Knightly is surprisingly dangerous, and where we might expect this to be an affair built on love, these two actors, along with their director, instead choose to present it as one built on lust. There is a stirring physicality and sexuality to every scene they have together, as if anything were about to happen between these two people. Gleeson is absolutely fantastic as Levin, the moral counterpoint to the other men in the film, a good soul who holds to his beliefs, and Gleeson has a wonderful tenderness. And while the entire supporting cast are worth talking about, special mention has to go to Matthew Macfadyen as Anna’s philandering brother Oblonsky, the terrific comic heart of the story, a buffoon completely oblivious to his many despicable faults.

From the moment it begins, Wright’s film defies any expectations you might have about his approach to this adaptation.

As the affair and the film progress, the playful theatricality Wright sets up at the start begins to slide, and the film makes a much darker tonal shift. The heated foreplay of the affair starts to fade, and Anna is left to deal with the practicalities and consequences of her actions. The truth is, ‘Anna Karenina’ isn’t a sweeping romance like ‘Pride and Prejudice’ or ‘Atonement’. What Tolstoy gives us, and subsequently Wright and Stoppard, is a story about love rather than a love story; something that looks at the emotion as an abstract concept, and offers a collection of characters through which to explore it. It’s a far more cynical and intellectual exercise, and while some might be disappointed in the surprising lack of romance in the film, those who go with the film will find something just as rewarding and just as enlightening, so that the devastating finale is as much a meditative moment as it is an emotionally powerful one.

What Joe Wright and his team have attempted with ‘Anna Karenina’ is something truly ambitious, the kind of magic trick we once might have expected from Ingmar Bergman or Ferderico Fellini, and one that has certainly payed off. This is such a distinct, exciting and audacious film, as emotionally satisfying as it is stylistically thrilling, and further proof that Wright is one of the finest British directors today, and possibly ever. It’s the kind of film that really does need to be seen to be believed. An instant and indelible classic.

COMMENTS
TO LEAVE A COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE, PLEASE SIGN IN AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE OR CLICK HERE TO JOIN.

JRichardson on 14 February 2013 at 12:49 PM
Unfortunately, I can't get on board the 'Karenina' fan train. (See what I did there?) I found it to be a remarkably pompous, unbearably smug and insufferably pretentious display of pageantry, impenetrably in love with its own flimsy conceit and lacking in any kind of subtextual nuance. The design is disgustingly literal, smacking of an early stage conceptual production design ("Hey guys, wouldn't it be fun if...?") that was only committed to because two-thousand yards of satin had already been ordered by the overzealous production designer. Does it dazzle? Of course, as much as Pandora dazzles, or an IMAX sequence in a Batman movie. But it makes its point exceedingly fast, and never once has the daring to develop it - or abandon it. The whole enterprise follows suit, boiling down to the same arbitrary style-over-substance that seems to occur whenever Westerners (read: Americans, Britons, or Australians) adapt any Russian property to the screen or stage. The need to 'help it along', to add something extraneous to it to make it connect with audiences, seems a moot point. Was it really such a tall order to get a straight film adaptation 'Anna Karenina'? If, as mentioned above, it really is one of the greatest works of literature purportedly ever written, why does it need such extraneous embellishment? 'Anna Karenina' may be a great love story, or a great story about love, or great story about a woman's love of trains, but its story gets lost under so much set-dressing and gratuitous, tenuously legitimated "ideas" that nothing affecting remains. The Russian writers are already shrouded in intimidating shrouds of mystique and difficulty - to further add to that baggage (as Wright does), and in such a derivative way, is groan-enducing. Even Stoppard's script has the same arch literality of the blandest Russian translations, and not one actor is functioning on exactly the same page: Macfadyen's in a Moliere comedy, Law in a Chekhov cherry orchard, and Knightly's still trapped back in Darcy's pond. Wright's 'Anna Karenina' feels like an English production painstakingly made for English audiences; not in itself a criticism, but its disappointing reliance on cliche and artifice feels decidedly divorced from both its source material, and the Russian canon in general. It's also unbelievably boring.
© 2011 - 2017 midnightproductions | All rights reserved
© 2011 - 2017 midnightproductions
All rights reserved

Disclaimer | Contact Us